| Line 135: |
Line 135: |
| | | | |
| | :I'll keep going, but I wanted to post this stuff up now, so my screen doesn't get cluttered with tabs and such. [[User:JDBowen|JDBowen]] 17:33, 11 July 2009 (EDT) | | :I'll keep going, but I wanted to post this stuff up now, so my screen doesn't get cluttered with tabs and such. [[User:JDBowen|JDBowen]] 17:33, 11 July 2009 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | ::I realized I might have been confusing before - when I say, "link #", I'm not refferring to the numbered links but rather the list at the bottom of the page. So from now on, I'll say reference #, and if multiple links are included in a reference, ref #, first/second/etc. link. |
| | + | |
| | + | ::Anyways, on with the show: |
| | + | |
| | + | ::Reference (26) is broken. This is a toughie - most online references are copy-paste of the Wikipedia article, which itself sites these books: |
| | + | ::A Brief History of The Fourteen Infallibles. Qum: Ansariyan Publications. 2004. |
| | + | ::l-Qarashi, Baqir Shareef (2007). The life of Imam Husain. Qum: Ansariyan Publications. |
| | + | ::I don't have these books, and I haven't read them, so I don't know if they back up the reference. |
| | + | |
| | + | ::Reference (28) links to a video which, by the decription provided by the uploader, attempts to discredit the quote being referenced. A shorter video which arrives at the quote in question faster is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKGdkqfBICw |
| | + | |
| | + | ::Reference (49) redirects to the blog's main page, and blog does not have a search feature. Regardless of whether link is broken or not, we should replace with http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0409/White_House_No_bow_to_Saudi.html which is more to the point. |
| | + | |
| | + | ::References (56) and (57) are the same link, we can delete one for neatness. |
| | + | |
| | + | ::Reference (61) isn't even a reference. Suggest instead using http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26101 |
| | + | |
| | + | ::References (72), (73), and (75) are all broken. Suggest replacing all three with http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/was_barack_obama_really_a_constitutional_law.html |
| | + | |
| | + | ::OK, dumping again so my screen doesn't get too crowded. [[User:JDBowen|JDBowen]] 17:58, 11 July 2009 (EDT) |