Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,420
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 595:
Line 595: + + + +
→quick note bush vs. Obama bailouts: new section
RJ, I certainly agree with you that Bush's bailouts were bad for the American economy. However, to add Bush in a sentence I was just working on in the article made the sentence far too long and complicated so I removed the material about Bush being involved in corporate bailouts. I also think that since the article is about Obamamunism, the article should first focus on Obama. With that being said, I certainly would not object to any material added to the article about Bush's corporate bailouts, but I think it should be done later in the article. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 02:08, 5 August 2009 (EDT)
RJ, I certainly agree with you that Bush's bailouts were bad for the American economy. However, to add Bush in a sentence I was just working on in the article made the sentence far too long and complicated so I removed the material about Bush being involved in corporate bailouts. I also think that since the article is about Obamamunism, the article should first focus on Obama. With that being said, I certainly would not object to any material added to the article about Bush's corporate bailouts, but I think it should be done later in the article. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 02:08, 5 August 2009 (EDT)
::ok [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 02:11, 5 August 2009 (EDT)
::ok [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 02:11, 5 August 2009 (EDT)
== quick note bush vs. Obama bailouts ==
It is true that Bush initiated the corporate bailout process. However, I do not know if it could be said that Bush did far more bailing out in terms of magnitude of dollars spent, so I abridged your material. However, if you can show that the magnitude of Bush bailout expenditures exceeded Obama's, I certainly would not want to obscure or hide this matter. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 02:25, 5 August 2009 (EDT)