Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
357 bytes added ,  14:25, August 6, 2009
no edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:     
Article needs lots of expansion. It seems to focus on one reviewer's opinion of the South Park movie, to the detriment of the television series, or spin-off phenomena like "South Park Republicans." There's very little about SP's spat with Scientology, or the Muhammad censorship -- both of which were very public and attracted attention at conservative sites like FreeRepublic.com. And at one point there is a bolded exclamation that seems to address the author, which is just strange and kind of post-modern.--[[User:All Fish Welcome|All Fish Welcome]] 21:10, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Article needs lots of expansion. It seems to focus on one reviewer's opinion of the South Park movie, to the detriment of the television series, or spin-off phenomena like "South Park Republicans." There's very little about SP's spat with Scientology, or the Muhammad censorship -- both of which were very public and attracted attention at conservative sites like FreeRepublic.com. And at one point there is a bolded exclamation that seems to address the author, which is just strange and kind of post-modern.--[[User:All Fish Welcome|All Fish Welcome]] 21:10, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
== Atheists? ==
 +
 +
The article claims that atheists have been condemned along with pedophiles and terrorists. Can anyone give me evidence of this? While atheists are mocked, it is not more than any of the other groups the show goes after. They are definitely not in the same boat as pedophiles or terrorists.--[[User:Clintville|Clintville]], 06 August 2009
35

edits

Navigation menu