17,394
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: +
diversion
Jim Baker, Henry Kissinger, and others, all have speculated, said, it is a foregone conclusion he destroyed evidence, supplanted it. I don't know a single policy person, Democrat or Republican who doubts this, even if they might not state it publicly. As conservatives, we don't need a court conviction to prove what common sense tells us. Not everything, ''at that time'', was digitized. If he wasn't there to destroy evidence, you want us to believe he took such a huge risk for clap-trap? Open your mind! --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 21:32, 6 August 2009 (EDT)
Jim Baker, Henry Kissinger, and others, all have speculated, said, it is a foregone conclusion he destroyed evidence, supplanted it. I don't know a single policy person, Democrat or Republican who doubts this, even if they might not state it publicly. As conservatives, we don't need a court conviction to prove what common sense tells us. Not everything, ''at that time'', was digitized. If he wasn't there to destroy evidence, you want us to believe he took such a huge risk for clap-trap? Open your mind! --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 21:32, 6 August 2009 (EDT)
:::the speculation and surmises are thoroughly covered in the article. The problem is that it diverts our readers away from the big issues of foreign policy, and instead focuses them on the personal aberrations of a former policy maker. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 21:36, 6 August 2009 (EDT)