| | Jim Baker, Henry Kissinger, and others, all have speculated, said, it is a foregone conclusion he destroyed evidence, supplanted it. I don't know a single policy person, Democrat or Republican who doubts this, even if they might not state it publicly. As conservatives, we don't need a court conviction to prove what common sense tells us. Not everything, ''at that time'', was digitized. If he wasn't there to destroy evidence, you want us to believe he took such a huge risk for clap-trap? Open your mind! --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 21:32, 6 August 2009 (EDT) | | Jim Baker, Henry Kissinger, and others, all have speculated, said, it is a foregone conclusion he destroyed evidence, supplanted it. I don't know a single policy person, Democrat or Republican who doubts this, even if they might not state it publicly. As conservatives, we don't need a court conviction to prove what common sense tells us. Not everything, ''at that time'', was digitized. If he wasn't there to destroy evidence, you want us to believe he took such a huge risk for clap-trap? Open your mind! --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 21:32, 6 August 2009 (EDT) |
| | + | ::I understand, completely, where you are coming from, RJ. There is a middle ground. As conservatives, and as Christians, [[deceit]] ranks as high as foreign policy, or anything else. The deceit is evidence of their inability to do anything ethically, and surely you would agree, lack of ethics in implementing and forging foreign policy, or monetary policy is a major impediment. I have confidence in the ability of two scholars like you and Rob, to arrive at a mutually acceptable manner of making BOTH points! :-) -- --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 21:43, 6 August 2009 (EDT) |