28
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + +
Talk:Liberal indoctrination (view source)
Revision as of 13:50, August 11, 2009
, 13:50, August 11, 2009no edit summary
==Why mommy is a democrat==
==Why mommy is a democrat==
While I may never buy this book for my kids its not an example of liberal indoctrination. People are allowed to write books on whatever they like and still more people are allowed to buy whatever books they like. Its hardly an indoctrination if you can choose not to read it. [[User:ClarkeD|ClarkeD]] 20:08, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
While I may never buy this book for my kids its not an example of liberal indoctrination. People are allowed to write books on whatever they like and still more people are allowed to buy whatever books they like. Its hardly an indoctrination if you can choose not to read it. [[User:ClarkeD|ClarkeD]] 20:08, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
==Dungeons and Dragons==
I play D&D, and Magic The Gathering. They are nothing more than Dice and Card games respectively. In D&D, you have the option to play villains, but it's only acting and the players know that. Dungeon Masters have a habit of making it hard for players of evil characters. In D&D, the questing knight, the valiant monk, the wise sorcerer are the good guys. Those are the people you want to play. In regards to M:TG, you cannot say they will lead to amorality any more than you could say that poker and blackjack lead to it. Therefore, I wish to remove that portion of the article and have more contributed to the indoctrination of children in public schools. No one mentioned it is a shame that our tax dollars pay for turning our children into immoral liberals. [[User:TheHeroExcelsior|TheHeroExcelsior]] 09:50, 11 August 2009 (EDT)