Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
571
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 122:
Line 122: + + + +
Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks (view source)
Revision as of 21:21, September 19, 2009
, 21:21, September 19, 2009→Conspiracy theory section: Re: MICasey
This garbage needs to be deleted. The article already outlines (logically and efficiently I might add) the well-known truth that 9/11 was the action of Islamic terrorists. Why provide a forum for what are mostly, quite literally, blame-America-first libs? Including links and refs to their insanity doesn't help America, it only creates more people with doubts. [[User:MICasey|MICasey]] 16:22, 12 September 2009 (EDT)
This garbage needs to be deleted. The article already outlines (logically and efficiently I might add) the well-known truth that 9/11 was the action of Islamic terrorists. Why provide a forum for what are mostly, quite literally, blame-America-first libs? Including links and refs to their insanity doesn't help America, it only creates more people with doubts. [[User:MICasey|MICasey]] 16:22, 12 September 2009 (EDT)
* I think the article here, briefly describing the existence of conspiracy theories and putting the theories in their place, while putting the conspiracy theories in their own article, is just fine. I added a "main article: ..." to the top of the section, to make sure visitors know they are only theories.
* I don't think we shouldn't include 9/11 theories on Conservapedia - we do include the Kennedy assassination, UFOs, secret societies, chemtrails, and many others, and some of these are more "garbage" while others are more likely to be true. (some conspiracy theories have been proven true, most notably ECHELON). -[[User:Danq|danq]] 17:21, 19 September 2009 (EDT)