15
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 126:
Line 126: + +
Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks (view source)
Revision as of 02:13, June 5, 2010
, 02:13, June 5, 2010→Conspiracy theory section
* I don't think we shouldn't include 9/11 theories on Conservapedia - we do include the Kennedy assassination, UFOs, secret societies, chemtrails, and many others, and some of these are more "garbage" while others are more likely to be true. (some conspiracy theories have been proven true, most notably ECHELON). -[[User:Danq|danq]] 17:21, 19 September 2009 (EDT)
* I don't think we shouldn't include 9/11 theories on Conservapedia - we do include the Kennedy assassination, UFOs, secret societies, chemtrails, and many others, and some of these are more "garbage" while others are more likely to be true. (some conspiracy theories have been proven true, most notably ECHELON). -[[User:Danq|danq]] 17:21, 19 September 2009 (EDT)
:Fixed the theory section as the reference [http://www.shns.com/shns/g_index2.cfm?action=detail&pk=CONSPIRACY-08-02-06 used here,] was not accurate and did not have any information about the matter at hand. I also included two citations needed as there was no basis behind these facts.--[[User:CR|CR]] 22:13, 4 June 2010 (EDT)