Changes

:That makes sense, and I promise that I'm here with good inentions. I'm a bit confused and taken back by my account getting blocked though, especially after I tried to explain that the edits are my own work. You even went as far to revert my changes on the Tax Day Tea Party article? Take a look at wikipedia's article on it. Nothing I added is copying Wikipedia. :-( ...that's what sucks the most about my getting blocked. I guess at this point I have to wonder what constitutes "copying?" Innevitably, some information may discuss very similar facts here as they do on wikipedia, especially when using quotes or sources that are the same, but as long as I'm not copy/pasting anything I can't imagine how my edits are considered to be copying Wikipedia. Besides, wikipedia is bias! I'm being very careful about my edits and have put a lot of time into them. So this is a bit frustrating, to say the least. Sigh. :-(  [[User:Tycoon24|Tycoon24]] 21:44, 10 October 2009 (EDT)

:That makes sense, and I promise that I'm here with good inentions. I'm a bit confused and taken back by my account getting blocked though, especially after I tried to explain that the edits are my own work. You even went as far to revert my changes on the Tax Day Tea Party article? Take a look at wikipedia's article on it. Nothing I added is copying Wikipedia. :-( ...that's what sucks the most about my getting blocked. I guess at this point I have to wonder what constitutes "copying?" Innevitably, some information may discuss very similar facts here as they do on wikipedia, especially when using quotes or sources that are the same, but as long as I'm not copy/pasting anything I can't imagine how my edits are considered to be copying Wikipedia. Besides, wikipedia is bias! I'm being very careful about my edits and have put a lot of time into them. So this is a bit frustrating, to say the least. Sigh. :-(  [[User:Tycoon24|Tycoon24]] 21:44, 10 October 2009 (EDT)

::As you can see from the [[Block log]], you were blocked for a total of 1 minute before I undid it.   

::As you can see from the [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/block block log], you were blocked for a total of 1 minute before I undid it.   

::For the record, your additions to the tea part article, starting under "History - Founding", began ''"On January 27, radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh criticized the [[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009]], commenting, "This 'porkulus' bill..."''.  Compare this to content from Wikipedia, second paragraph in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Day_Tea_Party#History this article], which says, ''"On January 27, 2009 radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh criticized the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, commenting, "This 'porkulus' bill..."''.   

::For the record, your additions to the tea part article, starting under "History - Founding", began ''"On January 27, radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh criticized the [[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009]], commenting, "This 'porkulus' bill..."''.  Compare this to content from Wikipedia, second paragraph in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Day_Tea_Party#History this article], which says, ''"On January 27, 2009 radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh criticized the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, commenting, "This 'porkulus' bill..."''.   

::There's nothing wrong with taking content from Wikipedia so long as you wrote it yourself, and to show this, it would be great if you could post here the screen name you use to edit Wikipedia. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:50, 10 October 2009 (EDT)

::There's nothing wrong with taking content from Wikipedia so long as you wrote it yourself, and to show this, it would be great if you could post here the screen name you use to edit Wikipedia. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:50, 10 October 2009 (EDT)