798
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 238:
Line 238: + + + +
no edit summary
I know people have been blocked for editing what you don't want to, so I wanted this okayed before I go at it. I propose a complete rewrite of this article. If you wish to have it in, I will still address the YEC point of view, and the starlight problem, but at the same time, I wish to cover such things as the history of astronomy, key names in the field, subsets of astronomy, major issues in the field, etc.. As it stands right now, this is now simply "Astronomy disagrees with YEC, therefore is invalid". [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 10:52, 20 December 2008 (EST)
I know people have been blocked for editing what you don't want to, so I wanted this okayed before I go at it. I propose a complete rewrite of this article. If you wish to have it in, I will still address the YEC point of view, and the starlight problem, but at the same time, I wish to cover such things as the history of astronomy, key names in the field, subsets of astronomy, major issues in the field, etc.. As it stands right now, this is now simply "Astronomy disagrees with YEC, therefore is invalid". [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 10:52, 20 December 2008 (EST)
== Proposed Rewrite Part II ==
This page needs to be completely rewritten. Only the first two paragraphs pertain to astronomy at all and that certainly isn't enough to adequate explain this field of science. The Starlight section should be removed as this is covered in a separate article and is really about a question or origins and cosmology. The Young Earth Creation section seems tacked on for no real reason and should be removed also. Instead an article on what astronomy is, the disciplines within it, and a history of the science is what should be here. I want ask here first if there is any objection before rewriting this article. I have noticed it has not been touched since June of 2008 and not significantly since September of 2007 making it inactive. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 14:49, 27 October 2009 (EDT)