Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
290 bytes added ,  16:34, September 13, 2011
Line 242: Line 242:     
This page needs to be completely rewritten.  Only the first two paragraphs pertain to astronomy at all and that certainly isn't enough to adequate explain this field of science.  The Starlight section should be removed as this is covered in a separate article and is really about a question or origins and cosmology.  The Young Earth Creation section seems tacked on for no real reason and should be removed also.  Instead an article on what astronomy is, the disciplines within it, and a history of the science is what should be here.  I want ask here first if there is any objection before rewriting this article.  I have noticed it has not been touched since June of 2008 and not significantly since September of 2007 making it inactive. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 14:49, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
 
This page needs to be completely rewritten.  Only the first two paragraphs pertain to astronomy at all and that certainly isn't enough to adequate explain this field of science.  The Starlight section should be removed as this is covered in a separate article and is really about a question or origins and cosmology.  The Young Earth Creation section seems tacked on for no real reason and should be removed also.  Instead an article on what astronomy is, the disciplines within it, and a history of the science is what should be here.  I want ask here first if there is any objection before rewriting this article.  I have noticed it has not been touched since June of 2008 and not significantly since September of 2007 making it inactive. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 14:49, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Agreed. Anybody coming to this article as a source of information on astronomy is going to go away disappointed and with a low opinion of Conservapedia. As it stands the article is rubbish and needs to be completely redone. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 12:34, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
539

edits

Navigation menu