461
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 58:
Line 58: − +
Talk:Republican in name only (view source)
Revision as of 02:45, November 6, 2009
, 02:45, November 6, 2009→Article Guideline: sp
*'''Remember, please:''' The title of this article, "Republicans In Name Only" is just that. It is '''not''' "Conservatives In Name Only". What would qualify one person for an article of one name, wouldn't for the other. ;-) Thanks! ----[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 09:52, 20 August 2009 (EDT)
*'''Remember, please:''' The title of this article, "Republicans In Name Only" is just that. It is '''not''' "Conservatives In Name Only". What would qualify one person for an article of one name, wouldn't for the other. ;-) Thanks! ----[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 09:52, 20 August 2009 (EDT)
:Wouldn't that mean that those who are not even Repbulicans ''in name'' anymore-- Specter, Jeffords, Chaffee and Weicker-- don't belong in the list? Perhaps a new section called "Former RINOs". [[User:ChrisFV|ChrisFV]] 16:06, 5 November 2009 (EST)
:Wouldn't that mean that those who are not even Republicans ''in name'' anymore-- Specter, Jeffords, Chaffee and Weicker-- don't belong in the list? Perhaps a new section called "Former RINOs". [[User:ChrisFV|ChrisFV]] 16:06, 5 November 2009 (EST)
::<strike>Very curious as to why my last update was reverted. How can one be a '''Republican''' in name only if they're not a Republican?</strike> Resolved. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:05, 5 November 2009 (EST)
::<strike>Very curious as to why my last update was reverted. How can one be a '''Republican''' in name only if they're not a Republican?</strike> Resolved. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:05, 5 November 2009 (EST)