Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 61:
Line 61: + + + + +
Talk:Republican in name only (view source)
Revision as of 03:26, November 6, 2009
, 03:26, November 6, 2009→Hagel Graham: add content
::<strike>Very curious as to why my last update was reverted. How can one be a '''Republican''' in name only if they're not a Republican?</strike> Resolved. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:05, 5 November 2009 (EST)
::<strike>Very curious as to why my last update was reverted. How can one be a '''Republican''' in name only if they're not a Republican?</strike> Resolved. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:05, 5 November 2009 (EST)
==Hagel Graham==
Hagel sided with anti-war libs on the war in Iraq. Attacked the credibility of the President and his party. He was for amnesty. Obama calls him his friend. He has an earmark record.
Graham was tough on Republic SCOTUS nominee Alito. Graham voted for Democrat SCOTUS Sotomayor. He was for amnesty as well. He is for Cap and Trade. Always talks of fear against his party moving too far right, never talks about the disaster for this country of having far left liberals in charge.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:26, 5 November 2009 (EST)