Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 43:
Line 43: − − There are several examples of liberal bias in the Bible’s most powerful laws that I have not found corrected on conservapedia. I find it extremely disturbing that the Ten Commandments have not yet been adequately translated. − Of course, in the Ten Commandments, Israel is forbidden to kill or to lie by God (Exodus 20). However, we find numerous instances in the Bible in which God has supported murder and dishonesty. God, being infallible, could never make these contradictions. − In the old testament, God commanded the complete eradication of numerous peoples, such as the Amalekites in 1 Samuel 15. Also, God takes a personal hand in the killing of such notable people as Nadab and Abihu (Leviticus 10), Nabal (1 Samuel 25), and Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5). − God also has supported numerous instances of lying, blessing such people as Rahab, the prostitute (Joshua 6) and Michal, David’s wife (1 Samuel 19). Obviously, God is not as opposed to lying as liberals would have us believe. I can only hope that this Bible project will put this evidence into consideration and amend one of liberalism’s biggest intrusions into the Bible.
Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)
Revision as of 05:15, November 7, 2009
, 05:15, November 7, 2009Reverted edits by Joshuabrown (Talk) to last version by Joaquín Martínez
''':Daniel, you seem to be going round-and-round here, while rejecting the type of serious scholarship that you emphasize earlier as being so important. Scholars recognize that the phrase is not authentic, and it is undeniably liberal. Case closed, and your resistance to logic here is troubling.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:13, 8 October 2009 (EDT)'''
''':Daniel, you seem to be going round-and-round here, while rejecting the type of serious scholarship that you emphasize earlier as being so important. Scholars recognize that the phrase is not authentic, and it is undeniably liberal. Case closed, and your resistance to logic here is troubling.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:13, 8 October 2009 (EDT)'''