| Line 54: |
Line 54: |
| | :Issue resolved. Unless RJJensen has anything to add, I plan on deleting this section soon so that I don't have to keep looking at the "nasty vandalism" on my talk page. :-) [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 01:21, 6 November 2009 (EST) | | :Issue resolved. Unless RJJensen has anything to add, I plan on deleting this section soon so that I don't have to keep looking at the "nasty vandalism" on my talk page. :-) [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 01:21, 6 November 2009 (EST) |
| | ::I think we can keep the sabotage comment, which is true. And I thank TK for deleting DerekE's personal attack on me on his home page. DerekE remains on probation with warnings from at least three different administrators in recent days. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 01:35, 8 November 2009 (EST) | | ::I think we can keep the sabotage comment, which is true. And I thank TK for deleting DerekE's personal attack on me on his home page. DerekE remains on probation with warnings from at least three different administrators in recent days. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 01:35, 8 November 2009 (EST) |
| | + | :::RJJensen, if you take a look at [[Professor style]], I argue that that your judgment could be affected by it. Based strictly on your astoundingly bitter dispute with me and your erratic behavior, [http://conservapedia.com/User_talk:RJJensen#DerekE described as], "[A] tactic that might have been appropriate for the great Soviet Encyclopedia ... [not] suitable for an America conservative project," evidence of your actions suggest to me that you were acting in accordance with the [[Mental Ossification Curve]]. Both [[Professor style]] and the [[Mental Ossification Curve]] are at issue here. Based on these assertions, which are in no way a personal attack against you but merely my argument, you acted in line with that of individual under the influence of [[Conservaphobia]]. Contrary to [[Conservapedia's Law]], you not only discouraged an open-minded search for the truth, but rejected what I offered in my edit as simply "nasty vandalism." And then you took it to the extreme, rather than simply delete my entry, you banned me indefinitely and then proceeded to erase my existence from [[Conservapedia]]. |
| | + | :::I'm not rejecting your credibility on the site, nor am I personally insulting you with my argument; however, because I'm still unsure of the specifics in my edit that were, as you claim to be, "the nastiest of vandalism" that you've ever seen, I have no reason to believe my arguments are not justified. Maybe you can be more specific about what I added in my edit that is, in your mind, purely "imagination?" |
| | + | :::In the meantime, and forever (until moved to archives), I will leave this section here. I believe in the freedom of speech and in ones personal right to defend themselves against [[slander]] - which you appear to be doing by attempting to injure my reputation in this community. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 00:42, 9 November 2009 (EST) |
| | | | |
| | ==Vernon Davis== | | ==Vernon Davis== |
| | I have restored. Thanks for the vote of confidence. RJ is a good man, try avoiding contacting him. You da man! --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:02, 6 November 2009 (EST) | | I have restored. Thanks for the vote of confidence. RJ is a good man, try avoiding contacting him. You da man! --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:02, 6 November 2009 (EST) |
| | :Thanks! I promise to avoid him at all costs. I realize his intentions are in the best interest of Conservapedia, and nothing personal against me. I'll also keep in mind that he is and has much more authority than I do, and he is in fact a very renowned user within [[Conservapedia]]. For that I do respect him and his wisdom as a positive, influential member of the community. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 15:52, 6 November 2009 (EST) | | :Thanks! I promise to avoid him at all costs. I realize his intentions are in the best interest of Conservapedia, and nothing personal against me. I'll also keep in mind that he is and has much more authority than I do, and he is in fact a very renowned user within [[Conservapedia]]. For that I do respect him and his wisdom as a positive, influential member of the community. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 15:52, 6 November 2009 (EST) |