35
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Out of sight out of mind (view source)
Revision as of 22:06, November 13, 2009
, 22:06, November 13, 2009Created page with '== Liberal-bashing == I've just edited this page, partly to remove some silly and gratuitous liberal-bashing. For the record, it read as such: "For example, many liberal...'
== Liberal-bashing ==
I've just edited this page, partly to remove some silly and gratuitous liberal-bashing.
For the record, it read as such:
"For example, many [[liberal]]s tout [[solar energy]] as extremely [[clean]], but do not realize that the manufacture of the panels creates many [[toxic chemical]]s that are placed in the [[environment]]. Since they do not see this, they assume that solar panels are perfect."
The "do not realize" and "assume that solar panels are perfect" are simplistic assumptions. Furthermore:
"Another [[liberal]] example is [[terrorism]]: during 9/11, many liberals supported [[George W. Bush]] because terrorists had recently attacked. However, as the terrorist attacks on [[America]] stopped, they began to resent Bush and his actions to defend their safety and freedom."
For many reasons, this makes almost no sense. I won't enumerate the reasons unless anyone genuinely has an issue and wants to debate this.
Overall, it seems silly to provide "liberal examples" of this. Examples are fine, but ideologically branding them is silly.
I've just edited this page, partly to remove some silly and gratuitous liberal-bashing.
For the record, it read as such:
"For example, many [[liberal]]s tout [[solar energy]] as extremely [[clean]], but do not realize that the manufacture of the panels creates many [[toxic chemical]]s that are placed in the [[environment]]. Since they do not see this, they assume that solar panels are perfect."
The "do not realize" and "assume that solar panels are perfect" are simplistic assumptions. Furthermore:
"Another [[liberal]] example is [[terrorism]]: during 9/11, many liberals supported [[George W. Bush]] because terrorists had recently attacked. However, as the terrorist attacks on [[America]] stopped, they began to resent Bush and his actions to defend their safety and freedom."
For many reasons, this makes almost no sense. I won't enumerate the reasons unless anyone genuinely has an issue and wants to debate this.
Overall, it seems silly to provide "liberal examples" of this. Examples are fine, but ideologically branding them is silly.