1,767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 639:
Line 639: + +
→How about not using the bible as the only source of creationist reference?
*I cannot suffer myself to read most of this page, with unattributed posts. It literally makes my head ache, and there is no purpose in reading comments if one doesn't know who is making them. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 21:49, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
*I cannot suffer myself to read most of this page, with unattributed posts. It literally makes my head ache, and there is no purpose in reading comments if one doesn't know who is making them. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 21:49, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
**From what I see, the vast majority of posts is signed. In this case, the point of that comment is valid, and a little check in the History section would quickly give you [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Dinosaur&diff=prev&oldid=67143 this diff], Mr. Sysop. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 07:46, 29 March 2007 (EDT)