nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 641:
Line 641: + +
→How about not using the bible as the only source of creationist reference?
**From what I see, the vast majority of posts is signed. In this case, the point of that comment is valid, and a little check in the History section would quickly give you [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Dinosaur&diff=prev&oldid=67143 this diff], Mr. Sysop. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 07:46, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
**From what I see, the vast majority of posts is signed. In this case, the point of that comment is valid, and a little check in the History section would quickly give you [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Dinosaur&diff=prev&oldid=67143 this diff], Mr. Sysop. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 07:46, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
*Since I do not confine my efforts to one or two subjects, it becomes a pain, as I stated, going back and forth, interupting any train of thought I might have hoped to keep moving. But thanks for the tip! :-) --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 08:12, 29 March 2007 (EDT)