Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, oversight, Administrators
2,260
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: +
Talk:Liberal wordiness (view source)
Revision as of 18:00, November 17, 2009
, 18:00, November 17, 2009no edit summary
:::I'm not debating the fact that liberals are more verbose, or "wordy." What I'm debating is that the statement/opinion doesn't require or even '''deserve''' its own article. It was clearly created as a work of parody—by a user who has no other contributions—to create a mockery of this site. At the very least, move it to the Essay category if you insist on keeping it. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 12:54, 17 November 2009 (EST)
:::I'm not debating the fact that liberals are more verbose, or "wordy." What I'm debating is that the statement/opinion doesn't require or even '''deserve''' its own article. It was clearly created as a work of parody—by a user who has no other contributions—to create a mockery of this site. At the very least, move it to the Essay category if you insist on keeping it. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 12:54, 17 November 2009 (EST)
::::And? It's rather sad mockery as the user has only outlined the truth. I was going to say "if the article [[Bigotry]] had been created by a parodist, would you be inclined to delete it?" Then I made the mistake of actually checking, and discovered that it ''was'' (the user and content were obscene, so you needn't look at it yourself). Truth is truth, and if moronic parodists think they're mocking us by inserting truthful statements, something tells me we're not losing. As to your point about ''deserving'' an article, your opinion is fair, and the issue should be opened to wider contribution. I think it is, and I think MarkGall is concurring, tacitly. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:00, 17 November 2009 (EST)