Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
250 bytes added ,  03:50, December 2, 2009
We are open-minded and reluctant to quash any intellectual activity, but this unthinking silliness looks like it should be the exception that proves the rule.
Line 2: Line 2:     
Now that the "MemeShock language" has been removed from [[Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words]], I'd like to suggest that this page and any others be removed as well.  The methodology of this program has been rejected by Aschlafly and others, given CP's advocacy of open-mindedness and free speech to settle ideological disputes, rather than deception.  Jfraatz's title "Engineered Language using a Linguistic Deep Structure Algorithm" appears to be utter gibberish (pending his response; see the relevant section of [[Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words]]); given this I suspect that he is either a parodist, dishonest, or a pseudo-intellectual doofus of the highest order.  In none of these cases is there any reason for CP to continue to be a part of this "social experiment".  Perhaps Mr. Raatz could first outline his proposals in the Essay: space.  --[[User:JimR|JimR]] 22:18, 1 December 2009 (EST)
 
Now that the "MemeShock language" has been removed from [[Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words]], I'd like to suggest that this page and any others be removed as well.  The methodology of this program has been rejected by Aschlafly and others, given CP's advocacy of open-mindedness and free speech to settle ideological disputes, rather than deception.  Jfraatz's title "Engineered Language using a Linguistic Deep Structure Algorithm" appears to be utter gibberish (pending his response; see the relevant section of [[Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words]]); given this I suspect that he is either a parodist, dishonest, or a pseudo-intellectual doofus of the highest order.  In none of these cases is there any reason for CP to continue to be a part of this "social experiment".  Perhaps Mr. Raatz could first outline his proposals in the Essay: space.  --[[User:JimR|JimR]] 22:18, 1 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
: I agree.  We are open-minded and reluctant to quash any intellectual activity, but the above-described unthinking silliness looks like it should be the exception that proves the rule.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:50, 1 December 2009 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,203

edits

Navigation menu