115
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→MemeShock Algorithm: new section
: I agree. We are open-minded and reluctant to quash any intellectual activity, but the above-described unthinking silliness looks like it should be the exception that proves the rule.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:50, 1 December 2009 (EST)
: I agree. We are open-minded and reluctant to quash any intellectual activity, but the above-described unthinking silliness looks like it should be the exception that proves the rule.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:50, 1 December 2009 (EST)
== MemeShock Algorithm ==
Hold on guys:
You misinterpreted what I meant by engineering words with a deep-structure algorithm. What we do is engineer SETS of words and then find ways to link them back to each other in an (indirectly) circular way.
See the language is inherently circular in itself. If you look up a word that word is defined by more words and so on ad infinitum, however at some point with a finite language size the definitions must loop back on themselves. That's where the deep-structure comes in. We've got the "loop back" structure in a box so that we can use it to engineer sets of interweaving terms.
More here:
http://www.facebook.com/groups/edit.php?gid=12621914298#/topic.php?uid=12621914298&topic=4607
[[user:jfraats|Johanan Raatz]]