Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: + + + +
Sweeping claims based on "authorities" are disfavored here, and I'm inclined to revert the statements disavowing Pauline authorship of certain Epistles unless others demonstrate why that disavowal s
::"Factually accurate", JosephMac, does not include a [[liberal deceit|liberal]] POV. Wikipedia also says its articles are "factually accurate", but it is a truism they are not, being so riddled with liberal bias and ideology as they are. You should open your mind and try to discern the truth, rise above the indoctrination you have obviously been the recipient of. It will indeed set you free. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:39, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
::"Factually accurate", JosephMac, does not include a [[liberal deceit|liberal]] POV. Wikipedia also says its articles are "factually accurate", but it is a truism they are not, being so riddled with liberal bias and ideology as they are. You should open your mind and try to discern the truth, rise above the indoctrination you have obviously been the recipient of. It will indeed set you free. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:39, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
== Pauline authorship ==
Sweeping claims based on "authorities" are disfavored here, and I'm inclined to revert the statements disavowing Pauline authorship of certain Epistles unless others demonstrate why that disavowal should remain.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:51, 6 December 2009 (EST)