798
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
Talk:Scientific fascism (view source)
Revision as of 13:38, December 9, 2009
, 13:38, December 9, 2009no edit summary
For the record, this is a ''personal'' term created by a Congressman within the past couple of weeks, which means it's probably going to be considered opinion unless there are other examples of scientists engaging in this sort of behavior beyond Climategate. In my opinion on the subject, there has to be the application of some form of force, intimidation, or coercion by one group upon another to be considered scientific fascism. Any thoughts? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:30, 9 December 2009 (EST)
For the record, this is a ''personal'' term created by a Congressman within the past couple of weeks, which means it's probably going to be considered opinion unless there are other examples of scientists engaging in this sort of behavior beyond Climategate. In my opinion on the subject, there has to be the application of some form of force, intimidation, or coercion by one group upon another to be considered scientific fascism. Any thoughts? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:30, 9 December 2009 (EST)
:As a personal term a Senator came up with as a sound byte for his planned speech or protest, is this worth making an actual article out of? Personally I feel it comes off as a little anti-science. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 08:38, 9 December 2009 (EST)