Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: +
Talk:Scientific fascism (view source)
Revision as of 19:04, December 9, 2009
, 19:04, December 9, 2009no edit summary
:As a personal term a Senator came up with as a sound byte for his planned speech or protest, is this worth making an actual article out of? Personally I feel it comes off as a little anti-science. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 08:38, 9 December 2009 (EST)
:As a personal term a Senator came up with as a sound byte for his planned speech or protest, is this worth making an actual article out of? Personally I feel it comes off as a little anti-science. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 08:38, 9 December 2009 (EST)
::It just might be that, which is why I asked for examples of similar incidents outside of Climategate. But I think it would be a dis-service to science in general not to expose these allegations. Imagine if an astronomer has found evidence to confirm a certain theory, and someone else tries to stop him from publishing the data or sharing his views with others. I think scientists - whether we disagree with them or not - should be free to do their work and publish their data without being hampered or restricted by anyone. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:04, 9 December 2009 (EST)