740
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: +
→Citations?: Yes, it is good to add Bible references.
:Perhaps you should look at the two thousand years of Christian scholarship available to you. Or the ample information provided by creation scientists on genetic degeneration. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 19:28, 11 December 2009 (EST)
:Perhaps you should look at the two thousand years of Christian scholarship available to you. Or the ample information provided by creation scientists on genetic degeneration. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 19:28, 11 December 2009 (EST)
::If I knew where to look for the details, I'd add references myself. But unfortunately I don't; that's why I looked up this article in the first place. I'm sure other editors are more knowledgeable about theology than I am; why is asking them for better citations discouraged? Or do you honestly expect every reader to know Christian scholarship in sufficient detail to know where the article's content is derived from? [[User:Yoritomo|Yoritomo]] 19:38, 11 December 2009 (EST)
::If I knew where to look for the details, I'd add references myself. But unfortunately I don't; that's why I looked up this article in the first place. I'm sure other editors are more knowledgeable about theology than I am; why is asking them for better citations discouraged? Or do you honestly expect every reader to know Christian scholarship in sufficient detail to know where the article's content is derived from? [[User:Yoritomo|Yoritomo]] 19:38, 11 December 2009 (EST)
:::I'm sorry you weren't received better. Yes, I agree, we need more references than we had. I just added references for the main account; I'll try to add more to support the more minor points (e.g. mutations, lifespan). --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 19:52, 11 December 2009 (EST)