Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Translation: to the extent you think the KJV was 100% precise in conveying original intent in 1611 English (not all here would agree), then the substance should always be unchanged
Line 133: Line 133:     
I have found that the only thing that has been changed are the words. Does anyone else find this? [[User:NP|NP]] 20:23, 12 December 2009 (EST)
 
I have found that the only thing that has been changed are the words. Does anyone else find this? [[User:NP|NP]] 20:23, 12 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:I'm sure of what the Bible means here, but I'm not sure what you mean!  I think you're saying that the substance is unchanged for this verse between the KJV and our work-in-progress.  I'd agree, and that is usually the case.  In fact, to the extent you think the KJV was 100% precise in conveying original intent in 1611 English (not all here would agree), then the substance should always be unchanged.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:40, 12 December 2009 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,425

edits

Navigation menu