Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 135: Line 135:     
:I'm sure of what the Bible means here, but I'm not sure what you mean!  I think you're saying that the substance is unchanged for this verse between the KJV and our work-in-progress.  I'd agree, and that is usually the case.  In fact, to the extent you think the KJV was 100% precise in conveying original intent in 1611 English (not all here would agree), then the substance should always be unchanged.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:40, 12 December 2009 (EST)
 
:I'm sure of what the Bible means here, but I'm not sure what you mean!  I think you're saying that the substance is unchanged for this verse between the KJV and our work-in-progress.  I'd agree, and that is usually the case.  In fact, to the extent you think the KJV was 100% precise in conveying original intent in 1611 English (not all here would agree), then the substance should always be unchanged.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:40, 12 December 2009 (EST)
 +
::That is indeed what I meant. I appreciate your explanation for this, now I understand why this is done. [[User:NP|NP]] 20:50, 12 December 2009 (EST)
59

edits

Navigation menu