61
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 676:
Line 676: + + + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 16:20, December 13, 2009
, 16:20, December 13, 2009→Greatest show on earth, a question for helpful people
:::::::There's no logic in your objection. An intelligent designer is not constrained by an idiotic straight-jacket of consistency.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:56, 12 December 2009 (EST)
:::::::There's no logic in your objection. An intelligent designer is not constrained by an idiotic straight-jacket of consistency.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:56, 12 December 2009 (EST)
==The Greatest show on earth==
I am not sure if this should go here, but I had no answer on the Richard Dawkins talk page, and this may develop into a counter-example.
This is a copy of my post:
I have just finished reading Dawkins' latest book. Once you remove the usual authoritative evolutionist arguments, there is surprisingly (or not that surprisingly, actually) little information in there. I am quite impressed by one argument though: the comparative DNA 'evidence' described on page 153. If is my personal feeling that the results have most certainly been fabricated. In this case, a big blow could be dealt to the evolutionists by exposing the fraud. It is also possible that the results are correct, but the interpretation is wrong, or biased. Unfortunately, I am afraid I can not see, by myself, how the argument goes wrong. Could someone explain to me how to refute this particular statement from the evolutionists? Thanks in advance,
--[[User:TSpencer|TSpencer]] 11:20, 13 December 2009 (EST)