Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, oversight, Administrators
2,260
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 682:
Line 682: +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 16:25, December 13, 2009
, 16:25, December 13, 2009→The Greatest show on earth
I have just finished reading Dawkins' latest book. Once you remove the usual authoritative evolutionist arguments, there is surprisingly (or not that surprisingly, actually) little information in there. I am quite impressed by one argument though: the comparative DNA 'evidence' described on page 153. If is my personal feeling that the results have most certainly been fabricated. In this case, a big blow could be dealt to the evolutionists by exposing the fraud. It is also possible that the results are correct, but the interpretation is wrong, or biased. Unfortunately, I am afraid I can not see, by myself, how the argument goes wrong. Could someone explain to me how to refute this particular statement from the evolutionists? Thanks in advance,
I have just finished reading Dawkins' latest book. Once you remove the usual authoritative evolutionist arguments, there is surprisingly (or not that surprisingly, actually) little information in there. I am quite impressed by one argument though: the comparative DNA 'evidence' described on page 153. If is my personal feeling that the results have most certainly been fabricated. In this case, a big blow could be dealt to the evolutionists by exposing the fraud. It is also possible that the results are correct, but the interpretation is wrong, or biased. Unfortunately, I am afraid I can not see, by myself, how the argument goes wrong. Could someone explain to me how to refute this particular statement from the evolutionists? Thanks in advance,
--[[User:TSpencer|TSpencer]] 11:20, 13 December 2009 (EST)
--[[User:TSpencer|TSpencer]] 11:20, 13 December 2009 (EST)
:I wouldn't be surprised if they ''had'' been fabricated, since that's the norm for evolutionist "science." Their interpretation is biased in any case, as comparative DNA evidence shows the single hand of the creator. Leave it to evolutionists to twist anything to deny God, though. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 11:25, 13 December 2009 (EST)