Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 683: Line 683:  
--[[User:TSpencer|TSpencer]] 11:20, 13 December 2009 (EST)
 
--[[User:TSpencer|TSpencer]] 11:20, 13 December 2009 (EST)
 
:I wouldn't be surprised if they ''had'' been fabricated, since that's the norm for evolutionist "science."  Their interpretation is biased in any case, as comparative DNA evidence shows the single hand of the creator. Leave it to evolutionists to twist anything to deny God, though. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 11:25, 13 December 2009 (EST)
 
:I wouldn't be surprised if they ''had'' been fabricated, since that's the norm for evolutionist "science."  Their interpretation is biased in any case, as comparative DNA evidence shows the single hand of the creator. Leave it to evolutionists to twist anything to deny God, though. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 11:25, 13 December 2009 (EST)
 +
:: I don't really understand your point. The evidence could be fabricated, yes. Are you saying that even if it were not, it would actually be in favor of creationism? That would be truly wonderful, and a very good argument in a debate. Do you know where I can find more information on this? --[[User:TSpencer|TSpencer]] 12:28, 13 December 2009 (EST)
61

edits

Navigation menu