1,660
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 113:
Line 113: + +
→My two cents
:I am about to post a revision. People here are advocating that the distinction between scientific and common usage be added, so I am doing that. I am trying to be accurate on who makes the distinction, and what the distinction is.
:I am about to post a revision. People here are advocating that the distinction between scientific and common usage be added, so I am doing that. I am trying to be accurate on who makes the distinction, and what the distinction is.
: I am not sure that Popper and Kuhn have much to do with the definition of a theory. They do relate to how theories get accepted and rejected. Maybe they belong in that Scientific Method article. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:57, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
: I am not sure that Popper and Kuhn have much to do with the definition of a theory. They do relate to how theories get accepted and rejected. Maybe they belong in that Scientific Method article. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:57, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
Avoiding the philosophers here would be helpful, certainly. I really think that we need to leave out the current examples in your revision. I don't really want to do the editing personally because i hate edit wars, but I'd love to comment on it here, and post edits with consensus. Thanks.--[[User:PalMD|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:PalMD|talk]]</sup> 17:59, 29 March 2007 (EDT)