Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
why mention criticism later retracted?
Line 11: Line 11:     
"Any proof which uses the axiom of choice can be transformed into one that doesn't"?!  Lol.  If C is the axiom of choice, then C (vacuously) proves C.  By your assertion, that proof can be 'transformed' into a proof not using C, which means you can prove C from ZF, which is a contradiction.  Really, lol.  [[User:Tomkup32|Tomkup32]] 09:26, 9 December 2009 (EST)
 
"Any proof which uses the axiom of choice can be transformed into one that doesn't"?!  Lol.  If C is the axiom of choice, then C (vacuously) proves C.  By your assertion, that proof can be 'transformed' into a proof not using C, which means you can prove C from ZF, which is a contradiction.  Really, lol.  [[User:Tomkup32|Tomkup32]] 09:26, 9 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
==Marilyn vos Savant==
 +
Is there any purpose in the last few sentences mentioning Marilyn vos Savant's criticism that she retracted a few years later? I don't think her mistaken criticism is relevant to Fermat's theorem. [[User:Yoritomo|Yoritomo]] 10:15, 17 December 2009 (EST)
284

edits

Navigation menu