34
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 109:
Line 109: + + +
no edit summary
What's with the large scale removal from [[Sin]]? Admittedly, it could be made more concise, but dropping sections and removing key redemptive fact like "Only by trusting in Jesus Christ as God's offer of forgiveness, can we be saved from sin" seems a bit odd. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 14:38, 12 December 2009 (EST)
What's with the large scale removal from [[Sin]]? Admittedly, it could be made more concise, but dropping sections and removing key redemptive fact like "Only by trusting in Jesus Christ as God's offer of forgiveness, can we be saved from sin" seems a bit odd. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 14:38, 12 December 2009 (EST)
::there was lots of stuff there unrelated to sin as ordinarily understood. The "trusting in Jesus" statement is a sermon and is hanging loose, not tied to any of the many traditions that are covered in the article. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 16:00, 12 December 2009 (EST)
::there was lots of stuff there unrelated to sin as ordinarily understood. The "trusting in Jesus" statement is a sermon and is hanging loose, not tied to any of the many traditions that are covered in the article. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 16:00, 12 December 2009 (EST)
== William Safire ==
Why did you edit the Safire article to say he was a token conservative? The commandments state all information must be true and verifiable. The reference provided does nothing to substanciate your claim that Safire was a token conservative at the NY Times. For this reason your edit should be removed until a reliable source is provided. I have been unable to find one that is suitable. --[[User:MichaelJB|MichaelJB]] 12:54, 18 December 2009 (EST)