Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
173 bytes added ,  15:58, December 22, 2009
→‎Islam: new section
Line 114: Line 114:  
:: 1) I did not make that edit. 2) But what it means is that for many years he was the only conservative voice on op-ed (and the editorial page was very liberal). 3) it's common knowledge of the sort you get by reading the NY Times every day. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 15:20, 18 December 2009 (EST)
 
:: 1) I did not make that edit. 2) But what it means is that for many years he was the only conservative voice on op-ed (and the editorial page was very liberal). 3) it's common knowledge of the sort you get by reading the NY Times every day. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 15:20, 18 December 2009 (EST)
 
:::My apologies.  That being said, it shouldn't matter if something is common knowledge or not, the reference provided does not state Safire was the alleged token conservative at the Times.  According to the commandments all entries must be true AND verifiable. --[[User:MichaelJB|MichaelJB]] 19:21, 18 December 2009 (EST)
 
:::My apologies.  That being said, it shouldn't matter if something is common knowledge or not, the reference provided does not state Safire was the alleged token conservative at the Times.  According to the commandments all entries must be true AND verifiable. --[[User:MichaelJB|MichaelJB]] 19:21, 18 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
== Islam ==
 +
 +
So is there any reason why you removed sourced material from that article and replaced it with vandalism?
 +
--[[User:JeffD|JeffD]] 10:58, 22 December 2009 (EST)
153

edits

Navigation menu