2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 129:
Line 129: + +
→My two cents
I actually agree with you, mostly. I dont want to get into the single common ancestor discussion, but most scientists subscribe to some version of Evo in its entirety. That being said, I think that it is just inflammatory to use Evo or ID here as examples. I think if we need examples we could perhaps chose something less heated. The edit war would end, and references to other CP articles could be include.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:37, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
I actually agree with you, mostly. I dont want to get into the single common ancestor discussion, but most scientists subscribe to some version of Evo in its entirety. That being said, I think that it is just inflammatory to use Evo or ID here as examples. I think if we need examples we could perhaps chose something less heated. The edit war would end, and references to other CP articles could be include.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:37, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
: Agreed with Palmd. Thanks for playing nicely R.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 19:30, 29 March 2007 (EDT)