1,660
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 115:
Line 115: + Line 131:
Line 132: + +
→My two cents
Avoiding the philosophers here would be helpful, certainly. I really think that we need to leave out the current examples in your revision. I don't really want to do the editing personally because i hate edit wars, but I'd love to comment on it here, and post edits with consensus. Thanks --[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
Avoiding the philosophers here would be helpful, certainly. I really think that we need to leave out the current examples in your revision. I don't really want to do the editing personally because i hate edit wars, but I'd love to comment on it here, and post edits with consensus. Thanks --[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
: Agreed with Palmd. Thanks for playing nicely R.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 19:30, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
: Agreed with Palmd. Thanks for playing nicely R.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 19:30, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
I had to edit out that last little editorial sentence, which was an interpretation of a newspaper article. Didn't seem real well supported.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 19:32, 29 March 2007 (EDT)