2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 134:
Line 134: + +
→My two cents
I had to edit out that last little editorial sentence, which was an interpretation of a newspaper article. Didn't seem real well supported.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 19:32, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
I had to edit out that last little editorial sentence, which was an interpretation of a newspaper article. Didn't seem real well supported.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 19:32, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
:I also edited out "Evolutionists claim," for a lot of reasons. First, "evolutionists claim" is YEC weasel wording that is meaningless. The scientific usage of the term is defined by scientists, and it is defined as quoted below, end of story.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 19:37, 29 March 2007 (EDT)