Changes

I don't think your intro to [[Satan]] is correct, but I respect your writing ability too much to revert it. In the previous version, I had moved down your "embodiment" sentence [http://www.conservapedia.com/Satan#Secular_and_liberal_views here]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ^{[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]} 10:50, 13 January 2010 (EST)

I don't think your intro to [[Satan]] is correct, but I respect your writing ability too much to revert it. In the previous version, I had moved down your "embodiment" sentence [http://www.conservapedia.com/Satan#Secular_and_liberal_views here]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ^{[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]} 10:50, 13 January 2010 (EST)

::thanks.  I just expanded it somewhat.  I think that Conservapedia should not try to take sides in theological debates (for example, is the devil a real person or an impersonal force?) I think that just confining the Satan article to Bible verses misses 1900 years of theology and art.  [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 11:07, 13 January 2010 (EST)

::thanks.  I just expanded it somewhat.  I think that Conservapedia should not try to take sides in theological debates (for example, is the devil a real person or an impersonal force?) I think that just confining the Satan article to Bible verses misses 1900 years of theology and art.  [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 11:07, 13 January 2010 (EST)