Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
106 bytes added ,  11:03, March 30, 2007
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:     
'''Creation science''' is an effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible and not with the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]].  Creation science is not accepted by most scientists.  However, this could be due partly to the religious views of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences.  A poll among United States scientists showed approximately 45% of scientists believed there was no God.[http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html] In addition, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God. [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html]
 
'''Creation science''' is an effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible and not with the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]].  Creation science is not accepted by most scientists.  However, this could be due partly to the religious views of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences.  A poll among United States scientists showed approximately 45% of scientists believed there was no God.[http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html] In addition, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God. [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html]
 +
 +
This is clear evidence of the way the educational system is biased against the teaching of Christianity.
73

edits

Navigation menu