Clarified by adding 'usually with a literal six-day creation interpretation'
Line 1:
Line 1:
{{stub}}
{{stub}}
−
'''Creation science''' is an effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible and not with the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]]. Creation science is not accepted by most scientists. However, this could be due partly to the religious views of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences. A poll among United States scientists showed approximately 45% of scientists believed there was no God.[http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html] In addition, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God. [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html]
+
'''Creation science''' is an effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible - usually with a literal six-day-creation interpretation - and not with the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]]. Creation science is not accepted by most scientists. However, this could be due partly to the religious views of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences. A poll among United States scientists showed approximately 45% of scientists believed there was no God.[http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html] In addition, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God. [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html]
This is clear evidence of the way the educational system is biased against the teaching of Christianity.
This is clear evidence of the way the educational system is biased against the teaching of Christianity.