Changes

== Cleanup ==

== Cleanup ==

I've removed a fair chunk of "material" which used extensive math jargon, (suspciously) well beyond most students, to make relativity look complex and true.  If other editors really value it, "mathematics of relativity" may be a good place for it.  This should help prevent our science articles from becoming incomprehensible like WP's. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 02:05, 6 February 2010 (EST)

I've removed a fair chunk of "material" which used extensive math jargon, (suspiciously) well beyond most students, to make relativity look complex and true.  If other editors really value it, "mathematics of relativity" may be a good place for it.  This should help prevent our science articles from becoming incomprehensible like WP's. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 02:05, 6 February 2010 (EST)

 

: I think that you have removed useful material. I do not think that it was complex or beyond most students. It was elementary and well-explained. I think that you have made the article harder to read, and less informative. I suggest putting it back in. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 02:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)