Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 465: Line 465:     
: I think that you have removed useful material. I do not think that it was complex or beyond most students. It was elementary and well-explained. I think that you have made the article harder to read, and less informative. I suggest putting it back in. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 02:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)
 
: I think that you have removed useful material. I do not think that it was complex or beyond most students. It was elementary and well-explained. I think that you have made the article harder to read, and less informative. I suggest putting it back in. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 02:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
::I agree with Roger here, and have restored the information removed. While this certainly isn't Wikipedia, I was guilty of not posting here explaining why I restored it...although in my mind the earlier revert was an answer to the edit comment that the removed material was over-complicated. My accumulated knowledge of complex math most likely equals 1/1000th of Roger's and I could grasp it, making it understandable to most secondary students, I would guess.... --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 02:54, 8 February 2010 (EST)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu