No, I'm not "missing the point." I'm reading your comments and responding to them. When I stated, "Jimmy Carter did not finance or offer material and moral support for Khomeni's takeover" you described that as "another disputed fact." Now you're suddenly reversing course and asking "Why would Carter "finance, train, etc" somebody to overthrow an exisitng ally?" Indeed, that was my point. Why did you earlier strongly imply that Carter had indeed financed, trained, etc. Khomeni's revolution? | No, I'm not "missing the point." I'm reading your comments and responding to them. When I stated, "Jimmy Carter did not finance or offer material and moral support for Khomeni's takeover" you described that as "another disputed fact." Now you're suddenly reversing course and asking "Why would Carter "finance, train, etc" somebody to overthrow an exisitng ally?" Indeed, that was my point. Why did you earlier strongly imply that Carter had indeed financed, trained, etc. Khomeni's revolution? |