1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 188:
Line 188: + + + +
→Definitions: It is not what I THINK at all
:Now, I suggest you give up arguing with Mr. Schlafly for the moment, and try explaining his ideas back to him. As Covey says, Seek first to understand, then to be understood. You'll never win an argument while your debate partner feels you don't 'get' what he's saying. And the audience will yawn or change the channel. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:31, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
:Now, I suggest you give up arguing with Mr. Schlafly for the moment, and try explaining his ideas back to him. As Covey says, Seek first to understand, then to be understood. You'll never win an argument while your debate partner feels you don't 'get' what he's saying. And the audience will yawn or change the channel. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:31, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
:: It is not what I THINK at all. I search for definitions and usage of "theory", and I find two. One used by those promoting Evolution, and one used by everyone else. I originally wanted to just put in one definition, but people kept putting in the second.
:: I would be perfectly fine with Cracker's definition, if it is the only one given. But we would have to lock the page, and face steady complaints from people who want to see the other definition. Maybe the page will have to be locked anyway.
:: As I said, if I am wrong, it should be really easy to prove me wrong. If anyone has good examples, please post them to the Talk page. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 14:44, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
== Oh, snap! ==
== Oh, snap! ==