Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 211:
Line 211: + +
→Oh, snap!: Can't call the film a documentary - because 'he' disagrees with it
Do they dare to say this? Of course not. And they won't let any other conclusions be drawn from their hypothesis. Which is why opponents have branded evolution as [[pseudoscience]]. Pseudoscience, as I pointed out at Wikipedia, refuses to follow the 3nd & 4th steps of the four-part [[scientific method]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:42, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
Do they dare to say this? Of course not. And they won't let any other conclusions be drawn from their hypothesis. Which is why opponents have branded evolution as [[pseudoscience]]. Pseudoscience, as I pointed out at Wikipedia, refuses to follow the 3nd & 4th steps of the four-part [[scientific method]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:42, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
*''"Controversial film" would be fine, but adding "documentary" gives undue weight'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle&diff=117274115&oldid=117268479]