1,660
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 194:
Line 194: + +
→Definitions
:: I would be perfectly fine with Cracker's definition, if it is the only one given. But we would have to lock the page, and face steady complaints from people who want to see the other definition. Maybe the page will have to be locked anyway.
:: I would be perfectly fine with Cracker's definition, if it is the only one given. But we would have to lock the page, and face steady complaints from people who want to see the other definition. Maybe the page will have to be locked anyway.
:: As I said, if I am wrong, it should be really easy to prove me wrong. If anyone has good examples, please post them to the Talk page. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 14:44, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
:: As I said, if I am wrong, it should be really easy to prove me wrong. If anyone has good examples, please post them to the Talk page. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 14:44, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
I pretty much agree with you their Rog.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 14:47, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
== Oh, snap! ==
== Oh, snap! ==