1,660
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 217:
Line 217: + +
→Oh, snap!
*''"Controversial film" would be fine, but adding "documentary" gives undue weight'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle&diff=117274115&oldid=117268479]
*''"Controversial film" would be fine, but adding "documentary" gives undue weight'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle&diff=117274115&oldid=117268479]
Actually, for evolution to be falsifiable (and it is) we must be able to posit a phenomenon that is not explainable by evolution. See my stegasaurus bone example. The peppered moth thing is only one small example, and if another explanation is found that is non-evolutionary, then it taps away at the base of the theory, but alone has not yet destroyed it.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 14:49, 30 March 2007 (EDT)