26
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 123:
Line 123: + + + +
→Incorrect, not inconsistent: new section
No problem. I used this episode as food for thought and added 3 items to the [[liberal logic]] list. Hey, that reminds me: assuming that because something once was true, it still must be true. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:00, 21 November 2008 (EST)
No problem. I used this episode as food for thought and added 3 items to the [[liberal logic]] list. Hey, that reminds me: assuming that because something once was true, it still must be true. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:00, 21 November 2008 (EST)
== Incorrect, not inconsistent ==
I removed several points from this list describing statements that were incorrect, but not logically inconsistent (''e.g.'', the "wondrous, pristine ANWR" point), which are probably more suited to the [[liberal lies]] article. [[User:CarlSfromMN|CarlS from MN]] ([[User talk:CarlSfromMN|Talk]]) 15:08, 18 February 2010 (EST)