Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
114 bytes added ,  05:24, February 19, 2010
no edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:  
:It may have been a "properly-sourced" edit, as you claim, but is it the truth?  What I saw was just a repeat of "did God ''really'' do that?", a philosophy taken up by the God-hating crowd since Eden.  We don't have to be open to points of view which pushes that sort of thinking.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:42, 18 February 2010 (EST)
 
:It may have been a "properly-sourced" edit, as you claim, but is it the truth?  What I saw was just a repeat of "did God ''really'' do that?", a philosophy taken up by the God-hating crowd since Eden.  We don't have to be open to points of view which pushes that sort of thinking.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:42, 18 February 2010 (EST)
 
:: I don't know whether it's the truth or not, only the apostle Paul knew for sure what he meant by that passage.  But it seems truth must be set in stone for you.  Thus when the Conservpedia guidelines claim, "Unlike Wikipedia, we do not block for ideological reasons", that appears to be just a joke. --[[User:Teamonger|Teamonger]] 00:21, 19 February 2010 (EST)
 
:: I don't know whether it's the truth or not, only the apostle Paul knew for sure what he meant by that passage.  But it seems truth must be set in stone for you.  Thus when the Conservpedia guidelines claim, "Unlike Wikipedia, we do not block for ideological reasons", that appears to be just a joke. --[[User:Teamonger|Teamonger]] 00:21, 19 February 2010 (EST)
 +
:::If the truth is set in stone, then what's the problem?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:24, 19 February 2010 (EST)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336

edits

Navigation menu