Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
no edit summary
:::If results are only of "borderline" significance, then we should not report them in so much detail. Anyone reading this article would see (A) the idea that there is no risk, along with (B) two studies saying there IS a risk. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:52, 23 February 2010 (EST)
:::If results are only of "borderline" significance, then we should not report them in so much detail. Anyone reading this article would see (A) the idea that there is no risk, along with (B) two studies saying there IS a risk. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:52, 23 February 2010 (EST)
::::well yes, but that is what is known right now. In another 20 years there will be better answers. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 10:22, 23 February 2010 (EST)
::::well yes, but that is what is known right now. In another 20 years there will be better answers. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 10:22, 23 February 2010 (EST)
::::I think it has been established to discuss the side effects upon children under 8-yrs. olds, their skulls are thinner, the radiation penetrates deeper into their brains, nervous system effects. [http://environment.about.com/b/2009/03/17/study-finds-cell-phones-increase-brain-cancer-risks-in-children.htm] The NIH concludes no studies completed on children [http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellphones] --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:12, 23 February 2010 (EST)